Friday, February 27, 2015

Has Ducati’s Success Flat-Lined?

ducati-1299-panigale

The saying goes that one time is a fluke, two times is a coincidence, but three times…three times is a trend. Looking at Ducati’s last three years of sales (2012-2014), which spans only a 2% margin of growth, by definition one has to conclude that the Italian company is experiencing sales stagnation.

Granted each of the last three years have been record years for the Italian motorcycle company’s sales figures, but each year has been a nudging over the last, seemingly at the cost of Ducati dealers who have found more and more inventory on their showroom floors.

But it shouldn’t surprise Ducati followers to hear the recent departure of Cristiano Silei, Ducati’s now-former Vice President of Sales and Marketing. With Ducati seemingly hitting a wall on expansion and model diversity, Silei’s departure may have been expected in some circles, and certainly all eyes will be on his successor Andrea Buzzoni, to see what he can do with the role.

Is all of this a sign that Ducati has lost its magic, seemingly during the leadership transition from Gabriele del Torchio to Claudio Domenicali? Or is there growth to be had from the Italian brand, now that it is owned by Audi AG? We examine that thought in more detail, after the jump.

2011 – 42,200 Total Units – 12% Growth

The last full-year of Ducati’s ownership by Investindustrial et al, 2011 was also Ducati’s last full-year with Gabriele del Torchio at the helm of the Italian motorcycle company. Additionally, 2011 was the first year that Ducati broke 40,000 units since the recession, if not for the first time ever.

The big motorcycle release this year was the Ducati Diavel, with an “EVO” update coming to the Monster 1100 as well. The Diavel gave Ducati a 12% sales bump, continuing the previous year’s growth of 5%, where Ducati unveiled the popular and new Multistrada 1200 platform.

While 2012 would post larger growth numbers, I would argue that it is here where Ducati hits its zenith, which should come as little surprise since it’s the same point in time that the Italians were shopping their company to German automakers. Buy low, sell high.

2012 – 44,102 Total Units – 21% Growth

In April of this year, Audi (through Lamborghini) officially purchased Ducati for € 747 million, and Domenicali was officially tapped to replace Del Torchio. By this point in time, the year’s new models had already been shown to the public, and were starting to hit dealerships around the world.

Posting 21% growth for 2012, it should surprise no one that the cause of this growth was the starlet that is the Ducati 1199 Panigale. The Ducati Streetfighter 848 also debuted this year, though it was responsible for significantly fewer sales.

Ducati’s sales strategy up to this point in time had been simple: introduce one completely new model each year, which pushed into segments that the Italian brand did not have a serious interest before hand, and include several model updates to keep the older models fresh in the eyes of consumers.

This is evidenced by the Hypermotard, Multistrada, and Diavel three-step big-unveil combo that brought Ducati into the 40,000 unit figure, and the constant slew of “EVO” models that accompanied them.

With this process now finally looping back on the aging Superbike line — Ducati’s bread and butter line for over a decade — in 2012 — we see the company hitting its last growth spurt with the debut of the Panigale, which reaffirmed the Bologna brand’s commitment to its Superbike roots.

2013 – 44,287 Total Units – 0.4% Growth

With the passing of the leadership baton now cemented, 2013 is the first full year of Ducati’s ownership by Audi AG, as well as Domenicali’s first full-year at the helm of the Bologna brand.

Post-recession, this is Ducati’s weakest model year lineup, with the Italian company’s “new” models being the water-cooled Hypermotard, with its Hyperstrada variant (along with the forgettable Diavel Strada model) as well.

A segment that historically has not been a strong seller for Ducati, it should surprise no one that the Hypermotard 821 didn’t move the needle for Bologna.

Perhaps knowing that the Hypermotard would gain only as much fanfare as its predecessor, Bologna also released the Ducati 1199 Panigale R, which was the first production machine from Ducati to cross the 200hp barrier (with its included race exhaust).

While certainly catching the fancy of Ducatisti, the high-priced Panigale R did little to contribute to overall sales. With no bold new bike coming from Borgo Panigale, a sales leader doesn’t materialize for this year, a Ducati sales are left stale.

The talk of 2013 though is the Ducati 899 Panigale, which debuted in September of thatyear and was ready for dealers before 2014 could arrive.

Conspiracy theorists would likely be right in their theory that Ducati released the 899 so late in the year as to keep the company’s positive growth trend alive on its sales, as the middleweight superbike model surely is the reason that Ducati’s sales growth stayed in the black for 2013.

Had Bologna not pushed the 899 out the door so quickly, 2014 would surely have looked like a stronger year (it only got a boost of say a thousand units from the 899) than it did with some of those sales going in the fall/winter of 2013.

2014 – 45,100 Total Units – 2% Growth

Instead the big growth models for Ducati  in 2014 were the Monster 821 (released mid-year) and the Monster 1200 — which took the multi-model air-cooled Monster line into the realm of liquid cooling, and outside the realm of a sub-$10,000 motorcycles.

The Ducati Monster 1200 covers an overlap shared by the Monster 1100 and the Streetfighter 1098, while the Monster 821 remained the company’s “entry-level” machine.

As the sales show, neither bike pushed the needle very far, which may have something to do with the fact that Ducati was shrinking the Monster line from three models to two, not to mention finally killing off the Streetfighter 1098 line. Replacing these four machines, with only two models.

That ploy might have worked for Ducati, and helped boost revenue, but the water-cooled Monsters were found to be lacking a certain je ne sais pas that the old Monsters had in spades. Their reception by the buying public was tepid, which may or may not be surprising considering the warm welcome they got in the mainstream press.

Surprisingly, accounting for more than half of Ducati’s sales growth in 2014 was the release of the Ducati 1199 Superleggera. Said to be the pet project of Ducati’s CEO himself, the Superleggera had the added benefit of pushing 500 easy sales out through the Ducati dealer network…at quite the premium.

500 units may not sound like much in the grand scheme of things, but in a year that grew by only 800 units for Ducati, the Superleggera was a game-changer and gave the Italian company another much-needed year of positive sales.

Unfortunately as MV Agusta has shown, you can only release so many “special edition” machines before the buying public becomes tired of the gimmick, and sees nothing special in your special edition models.

2015 & Onward

With the Superleggera one of the most expensive motorcycles to come from Borgo Panigale, it’s not until this year that we see Ducati introduce a proper “budget” motorcycle back into its lineup — something that would be appropriate for a new rider to purchase.

The Ducati Scrambler is of course the model I am talking about, and despite the machines heavy hipster marketing machine, its appeal has spread to veteran and new riders, men and women, and even millennials and boomers.

Ducati has big hopes for the Scrambler, internally expecting a 20% overall sales increase, courtesy of the machine. Aiding that figure is the all-new 2015 Ducati Multistrada, which debuts the Desmodromic Variable Timing (DVT), along with a refreshed Diavel, not to mention the updated and newly named Ducati 1299 Panigale superbike line.

Updating its star performers to keep them relevant in increasingly competitive segments is a strong move by Ducati, but the addition of the Scrambler is perhaps the company’s masterstroke, and the first sign of life from the Domenicali regime.

Add into the fact that Ducati looks capable of competing at the front of the World Superbike Championship, and that there are signs of righting the ship in the MotoGP Championship, and Ducati is finally looking on-track again — no pun intended.

What will come after 2015 though will be the real determiner for Domenicali and his Audi overlords. The likely sign is that we will see more Scrambler models, with various engine sizes, continuing to come forth — likely not from Borgo Panigale, but from Thailand.

Lifestyle selling will be key, as the current Scrambler models produce almost no actual revenue for Ducati and its dealers. Instead, Bologna hopes that the apparel and customization parts, which carry high-margins, will fill the revenue void, with the Scrambler acting as a sort of loss-leader.

The hardest transition for Ducati of course will be the realization that its home market is growing increasingly irrelevant. North America is now Ducati’s largest market, and the growth for the Ducati brand is clearly in Asia and South America.

To reach BMW numbers, something which is surely the intent of Audi AG, Ducati will have to look past its own nationalism, and evaluate the motorcycle market on a global scale.

This means models specific for regions like the USA, Southeast Asia, India, and South America. This also means targeting those markets with dedicated resources. And, this means prioritizing foreign markets over Italy, including at press launches, where Italian journalists outnumber the rest of the world 2:1.

It will be interesting to see what fruits 2015 bares for Ducati, and what Domenicali’s plan for the company looks like in a post-recession, post-Del Torchio, Audi-owned world.

Photo: Ducati

  • Ulysses Araujo

    No particular love for South America up until now; despite establishing local production in Brazil, new Monsters (821’s & 1200’s), Babygales (899’s) and 1299’s are nowhere to be seen (and not announced) in Brazil and Argentina. High acquisition prices (even compared to other premium brands) don’t help either. This explains why Ducati’s sales (http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/news/ducati-2014-yearly-sales/) pales compared to BMW (http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/news/bmw-motorrad-sales-2014/).

  • Piglet2010

    “Lifestyle selling will be key, as the
    current Scrambler models produce almost no actual revenue for Ducati and
    its dealers. Instead, Bologna hopes that the apparel and customization
    parts, which carry high-margins, will fill the revenue void, with the
    Scrambler acting as a sort of loss-leader.”

    With enough Lifestyle™ hype, a motorcycle company does not even need a competitive product – right Mr. Davidson?

  • Jack Meoph

    If they can’t churn out the Scrambler in suitable numbers to satisfy demand, they’re kinda hosed. Those that the dealers have, will get marked up due to demand and lack of product, and the reason to buy them in the first place (decent pricing) will be gone. I bought a 2014 Monster 796 and I’m glad, sort of. It looks the business, Ducati wise, even if it’s not all that in actual performance. Still plenty of bike for the streets though. As far as buying into the Ducati “lifestyle” ….. I don’t think so. This Monster will probably be the first and last Ducati I ever buy. There are a lot more motorcycles out there that give more value than Ducati, and I’ll only buy the nameplate once. I bought the 796 for less than MSRP OTD, but could have bought more motorcycle for the price from any of the Japanese manufacturers, but I wanted to buy a Ducati before the dirt nap.

  • XL2C

    (Beautiful, JB. LLAP.)

  • XL2C

    Ducati’s story sounds eerily similar to Ferrari’s.

  • Richard cranium

    Won’t they be churning them out of Thailand?

Source : asphaltandrubber[dot]com
post from sitemap

TECH ANALYSIS: Motorcycle Stability Control, Explained A quick look at Bosch's Motorcycle Stability Control, a multitalented system that's got your back...even at full lean angle.

KTM 1190 Adventure with MSC schematic

Bosch, at the end of 2014, released what it calls the first all-in-one motorcycle safety system: MSC. This Motorcycle Stability Control is based upon the basic capabilities of ABS and traction control but expanded it by the addition of lean-angle data to situations such as acceleration or braking in midcorner. “Our mission is injury-free riding,” Bosch engineer Frank Sgambati said.

Behind the development of this system is data from the German In-Depth Accident Study. Almost half of fatal motorcycle accidents are due to rider error occur in turns, and in two-thirds of these, MSC can help. ABS is already able to prevent one-quarter of casualty-causing accidents.

The classic accident situation is one in which the rider misjudges (often by under esti­mation) how much braking power can be used in a given turning situation or whether the machine has the grip to negotiate a given turn. Go to YouTube and see case after case of riders who ran wide, off the road, because they did not in timely fashion make the effort to turn tighter. Such riders need something to give them confidence that the machine can safely complete the necessary maneuver.

Motorcycle Stability Control in-use example

As a motorcycle leans over in a turn, the tire grip required to turn the bike is subtracted from total tire grip—the tighter you turn, the less is left for accel­eration or braking. But how much is left? As you accelerate or brake, weight is transferred from one wheel to the other, increasing or decreasing its grip. But by how much? The more accurate your information, the wider the range of your machine’s safe operation.

The novel element in Bosch MSC is a combination of a tiny but accurate Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), which constantly monitors the machine’s orientation and accel­erations in the three dimensions, and GPS, which tells the system which way is up. The IMU constantly measures the machine’s lean angle and its angle of pitch (nose down or nose up). With this data, angle algorithms tell the system how much extra grip each of the tires has at a given angle of lean or pitch, for turning, braking, or accelerating.

With this data, the system knows how much braking or throttle can safely be applied and modulates the rider’s control inputs accordingly, extending the range of safe operation. In a classic accident scenario, a rider feeling he has entered a turn too fast brakes and turns simultaneously, asking more from his tires than they can give. MSC makes more grip available for completing the turn by reducing braking force to what the tires can actually give.

Motorcycle Stability Control unit

The system also functions like MotoGP engine-braking control, preventing drag torque from a sudden reduction in throttle from breaking loose rear tire grip.

A composite braking function adapts front and rear braking torque to the riding situation, and there are both rear-wheel-lift and wheelie mitigation.

Brake pressure is also adjusted to compensate for inclines, with a hill-hold function. The system was introduced on the 2014 KTM 1190 Adventure and Adventure R models and is also fitted to some BMWs, but, says Sgambati, “We have motorcycle ABS projects with European, Asian, and North American partners.”

Riders may argue the pros and cons of such systems, but the healthy future of motorcycling depends upon steady improvement in accident statistics.

Your riding talent is free to shine through these aids, but MSC is there just in case.

Ducati 1299 Panigale with MSC schematicIT WORKS ON SUPERBIKES TOO!
Ducati’s new 1299 Panigale S also employs Bosch’s Inertial Measurement Unit. Road Test Editor Don Canet recently tested the big-bore Italian superbike (FIRST RIDE: 2015 Ducati 1299 Panigale S) in Portimão, Portugal, and reports that he never felt any intervention from the lean-sensitive ABS, even when riding very hard. The 1299 S is a true technical tour de force, boasting traction control, wheelie control, and engine-brake control, plus three ride modes, a quickshifter, and semi-active Öhlins suspension.

KTM 1190 Adventure MSC schematic.
Motorcycle Stability Control example.
Motorcycle Stability Control example.
Motorcycle Stability Control unit.
Ducati 1299 Panigale MSC schematic.

Source : cycleworld[dot]com
post from sitemap

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Recall: All 2013 Can-Am Spyder RT

2013-CanAm-Spyder-RT3

BRP is recalling all 5,165 units of its 2013 Can-Am Spyder RT “motorcycles” for problems with the engine compartment temperature when idling or in warmer temperatures.

Apparently the engine compartment on the 2013 Can-Am Spyder RT can retain an excess of heat, which in turn could burn the rider or cause the trike to catch fire.

At this time, BRP doesn’t have a remedy for this recall, but the company will send an interim notification to owners this month (February 2015), and will also mail a second notice when a remedy becomes available.

Concerned 2013 Can-Am Spyder RT owners may contact BRP customer service at 1-888-272-9222; and as always, the NHTSA is also available at 1-888-327-4236 and safercar.gov.

Source: NHTSA

  • Richard Gozinya

    “cause the trike to catch fire.”

    I’m ok with this.

  • Parabolic frolic

    “…when idling or in warmer temperatures.”

    Clearly there is no hurry then. At least not in Canada.

  • Moulder

    This is a poorly engineered product.
    Had they done proper testing this stupid issue wouldn’t have happened.

Source : asphaltandrubber[dot]com
post from sitemap

MotoGP Sepang 2 Test Summary – Day 3: Honda vs. Yamaha & Why the Open Honda Is Still Slow

jorge-lorenzo-sepang-test-motogp-yamaha-racing

Take a glance at the timesheet after the final day and it is easy to draw some simple conclusions from of second Sepang MotoGP test. Marc Márquez reigns supreme, with Jorge Lorenzo is the only rider to get anywhere near to him.

Cal Crutchlow has improved, but at the moment is only fast over a single lap. The Ducati Desmosedici GP15 is fast, but only in the hands of Andrea Iannone. Valentino Rossi and Dani Pedrosa have their work cut out if they are to match their teammates.

Bradley Smith has surpassed his teammate, Pol Espargaro. Suzuki is close, but not quite close enough, while Aprilia is hopelessly lost.

As attractive as those conclusions are, the underlying truth is a lot more complex. Testing is exactly that, testing, and everyone is on different programs, trying different things at different times of the day.

Or as Dani Pedrosa succinctly put it, when asked if he was trying out a new strategy for qualifying during the test, “we were just trying. That’s why we are here.”

Marc Márquez was undeniably faster than the rest of the field, and his race simulation was undeniably faster than anyone else’s. But just comparing the times does not provide the whole picture.

Márquez’s race simulation was fearsome to behold. 19 laps at an average of 2:00.760, just one shy of full race distance. 16 laps of 2:00, just three of 2:01.

While it is impossible to know how fast his out lap was – the analysis timesheets available only show the full lap times, and no partials, and Márquez embarked on his race simulation after spending 15 minutes in the pits – that pace would have seen him beat his own race time from last year by some 25 seconds.

That is seriously fast.

On the face of it, Jorge Lorenzo’s race simulation looks positively disappointing by contrast. The Movistar Yamaha man rode just 11 full laps, six of which were 2:01’s, the remaining five all 2:02’s.

That is just about the pace Lorenzo managed in the race last year, when he finished third, 3.5 seconds behind Márquez. But there is good reason to look past the time differential between Lorenzo and Márquez, and look at the conditions.

Márquez started on his race simulation shortly after 5pm, when air and track temperatures were starting to drop. Ambient temperatures were around 30°C, while the track was at 51°C.

Lorenzo, on the other hand, had the “brilliant idea,” as he put it, of running his simulation at 3:30pm, in the middle of the sweltering tropical afternoon. At 2pm, Bridgestone measured track temperatures of 60°C, and air temps of 35°C; by 3:30pm, the temperatures had barely dropped off at all.

Conditions are always tough at Sepang, but they were immeasurably tougher for Lorenzo during his race simulation.

Why do that? Surely, if you want to know if you can beat Marc Márquez, the best thing to do is to run your race simulation at the same time as him, and see where you stand? That rather misses the point of testing: yes, you want to measure yourself against your opponents, but most of all, you want to improve on your weak points, and be faster overall.

The weakness of the Yamaha is in hot, slippery conditions, and so targeting a run in the middle of the afternoon heat was a conscious and clever choice.

“All of the little problems the bike were magnified by three,” Lorenzo told the Spanish press.

If you want to fix your problems, then anything you can do to see them more clearly is the smart thing to do. What’s more, the race in October starts at 4pm, closer to the time Lorenzo did his race simulation than when Márquez did his.

Lorenzo and Márquez are also at different stages in the development of their bikes.

After the Sepang test, Márquez basically said the bike was fine as it was. He had decided on which chassis to use – the one he had selected after the first Sepang test, not the modified version which HRC had brought to this test – and now, the focus was on set up and riding style. “We just need to adapt our riding style, our bike to another circuit and see what is the level,” he said.

Lorenzo, on the other hand, said the bike needs more work. Though the fully seamless gearbox is an improvement over the old one, it still has one or two problems. What those problems are, Lorenzo refused to say, but there is still margin to improve.

Advantage Honda? Perhaps, but the advantage is not as large as timesheets seem to suggest. Honda are just about ready to race, but Yamaha still have some potential to unlock. Márquez’s natural talent shines undiminished, while Lorenzo’s work ethic and ability remain his strongest weapon.

Much more will become clear at the next test at Qatar. That track suits the Yamaha better, and the dusty surface can cause problems for the Honda, robbing it of drive.

Cooler temperatures are better for Yamaha, though again, only within a certain range. Once conditions get too cold, the Yamaha loses the edge grip it needs, and the Honda’s ability to stand up and drive out of corners comes into its own.

The ideal temperature range for the Yamaha is a little narrower: too hot or too cold, and the YZR-M1 loses out, needing grip to maintain corner speed.

Get it just right, however, and the M1 is a weapon capable of matching the Honda RC213V. Expanding the ‘Goldilocks zone’ will be high on the list of priorities for the Yamaha engineers.

From Valentino Rossi’s perspective, Honda still holds an advantage, especially in the hands of Marc Márquez. Rossi pointed to Márquez’s time and his race simulation for proof. “I think Honda and Márquez are the favorites to win the championship,” he said.

The new gearbox was an improvement, and Rossi was happy with the work done to understand its potential. They had spent a lot of time working with used tires, as this was where he had suffered during the race.

His attempt at a fast lap had been thwarted, the Movistar Yamaha rider constantly running into traffic in the first hour of the day. He believed he could have been in the top three, but discounted the importance of posting a single fast lap. “It’s just for fun!” he remarked.

Rossi underlined that it was hard to get a true measure of where everyone stands. Relative strengths varied from track to track, he said, and the way of working was very different between test and race weekend.

At a test, the work was very “start-stop”, he said. On a race weekend, with more limited time, there is much more of a focus, with no time to experiment. Every session was spent working towards a goal, and following a plan. At a test, the teams and riders can try lots of different things.

Clear choices have been made at Ducati, with Andrea Iannone expressing a clear preference for the Ducati GP15, and Andrea Dovizioso following suit a little more cautiously. Clearly the bike has more potential than the GP14.3, Dovizioso said, but some problems remain.

The middle of the corner, and the last part of braking were not 100%, but the fact that the new bike turns into corners and holds a line was a huge improvement.

Ducati Corse boss Gigi Dall’Igna was also pleased, though he too noted the problems they had encountered, especially in braking. Dall’Igna said that 80% of the comments given by the riders fit with the results of the simulations run beforehand. The other 20% were different, and required analysis to understand and fix.

Iannone was immediately comfortable with the bike, and very quick. Dovizioso was still struggling with the balance of the bike, his team working on setup and weight distribution.

That had prevented Dovizioso from trying a race simulation, or putting in a real attempt at a very fast lap. His team had wanted to try something radical, but did not have enough time to do so at this test. But Dovizioso was hopeful that it would be possible at the Qatar test, and would bring the improvement they are seeking.

With neither Valentino Rossi nor Dani Pedrosa managing to put in a fast lap during the morning, Cal Crutchlow found himself in the top three. But Crutchlow certainly did not just inherit the position by default.

The LCR Honda man’s fast lap was just two tenths behind Jorge Lorenzo, and was his best ever lap around the Sepang circuit.

He also set the time despite suffering braking problems similar to those Marc Márquez had on Monday. The brake pressure was inconsistent, Crutchlow said, braking normally at some corners, the lever coming back to the bars in others.

His race simulation suffered from the same problem. Crutchlow managed a couple of 2:00’s, but the braking inconsistency meant his lap times varied wildly.

When the problem wasn’t present, he was fast, when it came back, he lost time. On average, he was losing four tenths a lap with brake problems, and had a couple of laps where he had to slow right down waiting for the braking to return.

He would not be drawn on a possible cause for the braking issue, though he would say that he did not believe it was related to the temperature of the braking fluid.

Crutchlow wasn’t the only surprise on the timesheets. Hector Barbera was also impressive on the Open class Ducati, setting the eighth best time of the day. Like Crutchlow, Barbera has made a massive step forward since the first Sepang test, as he gets accustomed to riding a bike with more power and the ability to brake.

The Spaniard was 0.939 seconds faster than he was here last time, compared to Crutchlow’s 0.878 second improvement. Barbera had to break off his race simulation, after his Camelbak sprung a leak. The water was causing his visor to steam up, and by the time he went out for a second attempt, the afternoon heat had become oppressive.

The strong showing by Hector Barbera shows the potential of the Open class bikes, just as Aleix Espargaro did on the Forward Yamaha in 2014. But that potential must frustrate Nicky Hayden, and the other Open class Honda riders, as they find themselves in a similar position to last year.

In 2014, Honda’s attempt at a production racer had been humiliated by the Forward Yamahas. The RCV1000R was everything which Dorna had asked of the manufacturers: affordable (or relatively so), available for purchase rather than lease, and easy to ride for young riders. Unfortunately, it was also rather slow, despite the claims made for it by HRC.

Led by Nicky Hayden, the Open class RCV1000R riders suffered through the Sepang tests, ending a long way from the top.

Hayden had been frustrated in 2014. The bike lacked power, and Hayden ended the second Sepang test in 15th, 1.925 seconds off the fastest rider, Valentino Rossi.

In 2015, Hayden has a much more powerful bike, the Honda RC213V-RS: basically, the Honda which made its debut here this time last year in the hands of the factory riders, but with a conventional gearbox and the spec Magneti Marelli electronics.

The bike is certainly a lot quicker, Hayden lapping 1.1 seconds faster in 2015 than he did last year. Yet he finds himself having slipped down the timesheets, his improved time only good for 17th overall. Hayden has closed the gap to the front, but only by 0.227 seconds, the gap still 1.698 seconds from Marc Márquez.

Clearly, horsepower is not everything, as the teams who lease the Honda RC213V-RS have found to their cost. It is not the outright speed that is slowing the Open class Hondas, but rather the overall package.

Hayden pointed to the electronics as an area where the bike needed work, and given the sophistication of the factory Honda’s electronics, it is conceivable that the Open class bike is a lot more difficult to setup with the spec electronics.

The role which HRC’s software plays in engine braking, especially, will have a major role in performance.

More than just electronics, the difference between the Open class RC213V-RS and the factory RC213V highlights the difference in resources between the factory teams and the Open class teams.

Factory teams have hordes of factory engineers in their garages, and in the race trucks behind the garages, and direct access to the people who designed and built the bikes. They have access to all of the data from every lap by every rider, as well as all of the data from the simulations. Above all, they have a lot of warm bodies and sharp brains at their disposal, and can throw a bunch of engineers at a puzzle.

The Open class teams have no such luxury. Though HRC engineers will pay them a visit and offer advice wherever they can, the Open class teams come very low on their list of priorities. That leaves the donkey work to be done by the four or five people in the garage: a crew chief, a data engineer, and a couple of mechanics.

They may have plenty of data from previous years, but that data may not have been collected on the same bike. They must hope that one of their number has a few bright ideas to try to shortcut their way to a good setup, otherwise they are left with few resources and fewer people to try to find the ideal balance for the bike.

This is the real division between the haves and have nots in the MotoGP paddock, and without extremely stringent and impossible to police budget caps, it is a division that will continue to exist.

Pos Rider Bike Time Diff Prev
1 Marc Márquez Honda RC213V 1:59.115 - -
2 Jorge Lorenzo Yamaha M1 1:59.437 0.322 0.322
3 Cal Crutchlow Honda RC213V 1:59.658 0.543 0.221
4 Andrea Iannone Ducati GP15/GP14.3 1:59.722 0.607 0.064
5 Valentino Rossi Yamaha M1 1:59.833 0.718 0.111
6 Bradley Smith Yamaha M1 1:59.883 0.768 0.050
7 Dani Pedrosa Honda RC213V 1:59.912 0.797 0.029
8 Hector Barbera Ducati GP14 Open 2:00.244 1.129 0.332
9 Aleix Espargaro Suzuki GSX-RR 2:00.275 1.160 0.031
10 Andrea Dovizioso Ducati GP15/GP14.3 2:00.468 1.353 0.193
11 Pol Espargaro Yamaha M1 2:00.490 1.375 0.022
12 Danilo Petrucci Ducati GP14 2:00.556 1.441 0.066
13 Yonny Hernandez Ducati GP14.2 2:00.603 1.488 0.047
14 Maverick Viñales Suzuki GSX-RR 2:00.604 1.489 0.001
15 Stefan Bradl Forward Yamaha 2:00.685 1.570 0.081
16 Scott Redding Honda RC213V 2:00.695 1.580 0.010
17 Nicky Hayden Honda RC213V-RS 2:00.813 1.698 0.118
18 Michele Pirro Ducati GP14.2 2:00.875 1.760 0.062
19 Alvaro Bautista Aprilia 2:01.310 2.195 0.435
20 Mike Di Meglio Ducati GP14 Open 2:01.487 2.372 0.177
21 Karel Abraham Honda RC213V-RS 2:01.536 2.421 0.049
22 Jack Miller Honda RC213V-RS 2:01.593 2.478 0.057
23 Eugene Laverty Honda RC213V-RS 2:01.815 2.700 0.222
24 Loris Baz Forward Yamaha 2:02.587 3.472 0.772
25 Alex De Angelis Aprilia ART 2:03.300 4.185 0.713
26 Katsuyuki Nakasuga Yamaha M1 Test 2:03.448 4.333 0.148
27 Marco Melandri Aprilia 2:03.569 4.454 0.121

Photo: Yamaha Racing

This article was originally published on MotoMatters, and is republished here on Asphalt & Rubber with permission by the author.

  • TheGift

    Aprilia just has the wrong pilots! it’s not the bike.

  • PaulP

    Oooof, that RC213V-RS is a dog! Is being lapped in MotoGP really better than fighting for wins in WSBK, Mr Laverty?

  • smiler

    Meanwhile back in WSBK, close racing in both races, multiple manufactuers in the top 5 and a photo finish in race 2. All set in motion a few years ago. Though oddly in 2013 there was one full time Spanish rider, now there are 6, mostly refugees from MotoGP or 25% of the riders. Someone will have to tell Dorna to sort out Repsol and Honda. If the idea was to produce closer racing at a lower cost then how come Honda (with all respect to them) just change direction and turn up to testing with 7 different bikes and the gap from front to back is 4.5 secs. Really want to like MotoGP but difficult when Dorna are still not actually in charge of it.

  • SmokeyB

    If you want close racing with unpredictable results,
    tell Dorna to ban the use of fast riders and fast bikes in MotoGP.
    While you’re at it, why not make every one race on a GP12 Duck for good measure.

Source : asphaltandrubber[dot]com
post from sitemap

TEN QUESTIONS: Marco Zuliani Aprilia’s Director of Product Development and Strategy discusses the new Caponord 1200 Rally. With VIDEO!

Marco Zuliani posing with the Aprilia Caponord Rally

Q: When the current Caponord came out, was there a Rally adventure version already in the plans?
A: Of course. When we first started to develop the new Caponord, which was introduced in 2013, we knew it would be a family of bikes. At that time, we had the choice of which model to release first. Due to the heritage and sportiness of the Aprilia brand—and also to make something that was a bit different from the general enduro bike of the time—we thought the version with 17-in. wheels would be best. We’ve had it in our plans to expand the family with a Rally version, and that’s what we’ve done now, two years later.

Q: What did you do with the front geometry after switching to the 19-in. front wheel?
A: Aprilia has always been very focused on riding pleasure and dynamic performance. Our work was more than just putting new wheels on the bike. We worked on the entire package to maintain the performance and pleasure. We worked a lot on the front geometry. We have a new offset for the triple clamps. The fork is new. It has the advanced front axle, which has been moved ahead to reduce trail. A larger wheel means a larger radius. So, with unchanged geometry, you will have a larger trail. With the advanced axle, you reduce trail.

Aprilia Caponord 1200 Rally front wheel close-up

Q: The automatic preload setting works so well, why bother with all the others?
A: The other options were kind of free. We have the opportunity to electronically adjust the preload. Maybe somebody prefers, for example, the bike to be a little bit more on the front wheel in turns. It gives more opportunities of adjustment for the rider. We suggest that you leave it in automatic because it’s always a perfect setting.

Q: Would it make sense to switch to a soft, single-rider setting if you plan to ride the Rally in the dirt?
A: No. We are only talking about preload here. When we say single rider, the preload is suitable for an average rider who’s about 70 to 75 kilograms (154 to 165 lb.). So, probably, if you’re lighter than that, the automatic setting would be suited better for you. Same if you are heavier than that standard. Even in off-road conditions, you can go with Automatic and you will be fine. Also, the damping management is always happening automatically on the Rally, even if you set the preload for a single rider. Our system also has self-adaptive capabilities that meant we didn’t have to do any type of calibration when we switched to the new wheel sizes. The Aprilia Dynamic Damping settings and calibration are exactly the same on the Rally. You don’t have to do anything with the suspension when you go off-road, but you’ll probably feel that it works very well.

2015 Aprilia Caponord 1200 Rally studio side view

Q: Can you compare the Caponord Rally with the Ducati Multistrada?
A: The Multistrada is a much more road-oriented bike. We offer more versatility. We wanted to maintain the sportiness of the Rally version. Of course, compared to the Multistrada, the Caponord Rally offers more in terms of adventure, in the types of roads the rider can travel on. The Multistrada is more similar to our Caponord with 17-in. wheels. You will never do a Paris-Dakar on a Caponord Rally, but in off-road conditions you can use the bike without any problems and it behaves quite well. If we look at Multistrada, we offer higher versatility.

Q: Is the Caponord Rally built with a particular market in mind?
A: Adventure bikes are an interesting segment. They still sell well in Europe. Especially in Northern European countries like Germany, France, and Austria. The UK is doing pretty well. I would also say Italy, but it’s not the main market for this kind of bike. I think the United States could be an interesting market. The adventure bike segment is growing in the US. We are doing pretty well in the US with our sportbikes. We hope it will also be a good market for the Caponord Rally.

Aprilia Caponord 1200 Rally side bags

Q: Are the 1200 Rally’s tubular protection bars for actual protection or just cosmetic?
A: They are absolutely functional. We are very practical people. We do not like to add parts on the bike if they are not really functional. We added this protection to the fairing and the engine. With regard to the panniers, we already had them ready for the standard Caponord, the Travel Pack. But the ones on the Rally are different. For the Rally, we introduced aluminum-covered panniers that have a specific steel trellis support. This gives the bike a bit more protection in case of off-road use or a fall. And the aluminum-covered pannier cases are not just a matter of having an adventure look. They are also functional. We like to combine both these things.

Q: What can you tell us about the wire-spoke wheels?
A: They’re built according to an Aprilia patent from 2001, when we introduced the first ETV1000. This patent, with this particular construction, allows us to mount tubeless tires without a complicated sealing system. This helps to reduce weight. The rim is aluminum; the spokes are stainless steel. What I can say is this: Compared to our competitors, we have the lightest wheels in the category.

http://cf.c.ooyala.com/FpOGtsczoAGnZ-MIsqRP5EjnOuebjVMA/MGngRNnbuHoiqTJH4xMDoxOjA4MTsiGN

Q: How did you choose the Metzeler Tourance Next tires?
A: We test many brands. Usually the best sellers in the market. We want to be sure that the bike works with all the best-selling brands. We find the best solution for us—best performance, best mileage, and possibly best cost. In this case, the Metzeler Tourance Nexts are quite expensive, but our test riders gave the tires very good results. We did not want to compromise. We chose the best. The tires are very good on the road and off, probably because of the good balance of the bike, the good weight distribution. We also got great mileage out of the tire. We reached up to 12,000 kilometers (7,456 miles) before they’d have to be changed.

Q: If a customer planned to do some dirt riding, could he mount some, say, Continental TKC80s?
A: Yes. The bike is homologated for 110/90 fronts and 150/70 rears, and in these sizes there are plenty of choices for more off-road-oriented tires. So, absolutely, yes. We’ve tested them. For the Moto Guzzi Stelvio, for instance, we have those sizes, so we already have a background and knowledge with those kinds of tires.

Marco Zuliani.
Marco Zuliani.
2015 Aprilia Caponord 1200 Rally.
Front wheel.
Side bag.

Source : cycleworld[dot]com
post from sitemap

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Oregon Looking at Two Possible Lane-Splitting Bills

state-of-oregon-flag

The great State of Oregon, my newfound home, now has two lane-splitting laws on the docket for 2015. Senate Bill 172, introduced by State Senator Brian Boquist (R-Dallas), would permit motorcycle and moped riders to pass in a lane with traffic, if that traffic is stopped or has slowed to less than 10 mph, and the lane-splitting rider is traveling at a speed of 20 mph or less.

Meanwhile Senate Bill 420, introduced by State Senator Jeff Kruse (R-Roseburg), is a little less restrictive in its provisions, and would allow lane-splitting if traffic is stopped or slowed to 25 mph or less, and the motorcyclist is traveling at 35 mph or slower.

Both laws are more restrictive than the guidelines put forward by the California Highway Patrol (California being the only state in the USA that permits motorcycles to lane-split), but would be a start in the right direction for The Beaver State.

The California Highway Patrol has gone on to report that a study done in conjunction with the Univeristy of California, Berkelely has shown that when done safely, i.e. using the CHP’s lane-splitting guidelines, lane-splitting is no more dangerous than riding a motorcycle in general.

Lane-splitting also adds the benefit of decongesting traffic on roadways, protecting riders from rear-end collisions, and saving costs on wasted fuel by idling vehicles.

For the motorcycle industry, pro lane-splitting legislation could cause an influx of commuters to purchasing motorcycles, as a means to avoid traffic during rush hour times — adding not only to the influence of the motorcycling community, but also added revenues.

While riders should support the efforts to legalize lane-splitting in Oregon, the only downside to the proposed laws is that they could create confusion for multi-state riders, who cross from California and enter Oregon, and thus would have substantially different laws regulating their lane-splitting actions (this issue is compounded if recent efforts to legalize lane-splitting in Washington are successful).

Ideally, Oregon would adopt a law that is similar to the CHP’s guidelines or Washington’s proposed measures, making for a unified code of lane-splitting conduct on the West Coast.

If only the American Motorcyclist Association would draft a sample law for legislatures to use and build upon, rather than simply publishing press releases that echo their support of lane-splitting laws (as long as they don’t come attached with helmet-wearing requirements, of course).

In the meantime, we highly encourage all Oregonian riders to contact the State Legislature, and urge them to support these bills.

Source: SB 172 & SB 420

  • Brad Franks

    I totally support lane splitting, and I like your idea of a unified lane splitting west coast. But what does a helmet law rider (no pun) have to do with anything?

    You are turning your argument for lane splitting into a civil liberties debate. We need to keep that isolated lest it sully lane splitting into a debate on constitutionality, which it isn’t and never should be.

    Motorcyclists should unite around motorcycling, not partisan politics.

  • Mitchel Durnell

    Two pro-tips for riders:
    1. Don’t look at the comments for stories like these on news sites/FB
    2. If you do, and you have to wade in… doing it Ghandi style (‘love your enemy’) is really the only thing that will tame the cager that literally calls for your murder – you’re not gonna out-hate them. Zen, and all that.

  • irksome

    If this ever happens in Massachusetts, I will wait a minimum of 3yrs prior to doing it myself. I have tasted door before.
    We’re not bad drivers, we’re just åssholes.

  • mudgun

    Lane splitting is not a good name for the practice, it just sounds aggressive, where as filtering sounds friendlier…something you do to help your car driving neighbors by getting out of their way. It probably don’t matter but it seems to me that if car drivers understood it’s better for them too…just saying.
    What I’m really interested in are those double yellow lines through the mountains which seem to go on forever. I pass cars as soon as it’s safe to do so, but I am breaking the law. I’ve never been caught but would much prefer it be legal.

  • Mitchel Durnell

    I’ve never really thought about the terminology; you have a really good point there.

  • http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/ Jensen Beeler
  • http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/ Jensen Beeler

    It’s a valid point on branding, though filtering and lane-splitting are often thought as two different acts abroad.

Source : asphaltandrubber[dot]com
post from sitemap

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

2015 Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS Comes to America for $14,399

2015-Suzuki-GSX-R1000-ABS-01

A late announcement to the Suzuki motorcycle lineup, the 2015 Suzuki GSX-R1000 comes with the banner headline of adding anti-locking brake system (ABS) and a bold new “Suzuki Racing Blue” graphics package (BNG) to the venerable superbike.

The added safety of ABS is at least a welcomed change to the now seven-year-old model version of the Suzuki GSX-R1000. Meanwhile, the graphics package is designed to make a link between the GSX-R1000 and Suzuki’s MotoGP race bike, the Suzuki GSX-RR — even though the street bike pre-dates its racing counterpart all the way back to when Suzuki was last entered in the premier class.

The rest of Suzuki’s press release tries to make you forget that the 2015 model year bike is the same machine that we have seen for the better part of a decade, trotting out terms like “Finite Element Method” as being part of the engine piston design — a process virtually every manufacture uses in the motorcycle industry.

Big Piston Forks (BPF) from Showa are standard as wel, and another feature of the Suzuki package, as is the twin-spar aluminum frame. “The most successful motorcycle in AMA Superbike racing,” a Suzuki hasn’t won America’s premier racing class since 2009 (Mat Mladin’s last year), which coincidently is when the current model first debuted.

We are not sure if Suzuki Motor America meant to highlight the fact that the current model effectively was the end of the company’s road racing dominance in the United States, but it is here again for 2015 with new brakes and new paint. MSRP is $14,399 for the ABS model, and $13,899 for the base model.

Suzuki is the last of the Japanese OEMs to wake up from the product development slumber of the recession, and it shows with this model release.

With Honda showing the RC213V-S, Yamaha recently launching the new YZF-R1, and Kawasaki wowing the crowd with the supercharged H2R, we are left wanting more from Hamamatsu. Maybe next year.

2015-Suzuki-GSX-R1000-ABS-02

2015-Suzuki-GSX-R1000-ABS-05

2015-Suzuki-GSX-R1000-ABS-03

2015-Suzuki-GSX-R1000-ABS-04

Source: Suzuki Motor America

Source : asphaltandrubber[dot]com
post from sitemap

XXX: The 2015 Yamaha YZF-R1 World Endurance Race Bike is Pure Sex…with a Headlight

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-25

The long-winded “Yamaha France GMT 94 Michelin Racing” team is ready for FIM Endurance World Championship action this year, especially with the all-new 2015 Yamaha YZF-R1 motorcycle.

The new R1 offers state-of-the-art electronics, as well as near-200hp from its crossplane four-cylinder engine, and the French team is looking to capitalize on those improvements in the EWC for 2015.

Yamaha France took the 2014 title in a convincing fashion, so it will be interesting to see what riders David Checa, Kenny Foray, and Mathieu Gines can accomplish with their new toy. We’ve got a bevy of high-resolution photos for you, after the jump.

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-17

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-38

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-39

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-10

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-13

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-14

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-30

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-36

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-37

2015-Yamaha-YZF-R1M-GMT94-EWC--endurance-race-bike-07

Source: Yamaha France GMT94 EWC Race Team

  • bjg

    what’s the little red rectangle stuck to the subframe?

  • YamaPro

    Looks good. I always liked Yamaha blue. That royal blue its sweet with white. The exhaust I don’t like at all. Why didn’t they use a GP looking exhaust from their M1 a couple of years ago. Something that looks like an Austin Racing.

  • Bern

    How nice is that…..

  • rrb

    HM Quickshifter LCD screen.

  • paulus

    Very sexy, but the swingarm would have been nice in black to match the frame. Just a personal preference.

  • TheSeaward

    I’m not going to make it to my bunk.

  • Damn

    damn! that bike looks great.!

  • Android

    im sorry but the new R1 is just hideous, no paintjob will save it IMO

Source : asphaltandrubber[dot]com
post from sitemap